Wednesday, October 14, 2009

This is a photo taken by a passing motorist on the Skyway bridge. Dan Aberg was passing by the scene traveling about 50 mph, saw the following and took this cell phone picture. The man in the picture (allegedly) had set fire to the car with his ex-wife in the trunk. That is what we see on fire. Shortly after this photo was taken, the man jumped to his death.

(photo courtesy of the St. Petersburg Times)

Monday, October 05, 2009

The third day of the African Journalist Conference. Today the focus was the difficulty for journalists in reporting on issues for the complex collection of states in the African Continent. Many areas do not have internet access, telephone landlines, or even electricity, tools Americans are increasingly taking for granted. A majority of the 53 countries on the African Continent are rural dwellers, where it is difficult to get the services that make modern communications possible.



Nigeria, with a population of 150 million, only has internet access for about 10 million -- a small fraction. All over Africa, power supplies vary and the computers themselves are reserved for those with means. Cell phones are fast becoming the most popular way for the journalists at the conference to access the internet.

It is difficult for a journalist to get the tools to compete in the global market. But they are not without the drive that is common to all who desire to find the truth.



Elie Smith, a Paris Based writer for the Journalist Service Anglais service, talked about his arrest by the Cameroonian government in 1995 after entering the country. "They got me right outside the airport," Smith said, "they wouldn't let me in." He was in jail for a week, then escorted to the first plane out of the country.

Women in reporting was another topic. Traditional values made women work much harder than men to get their perspectives heard. Sandra Williams, a community radio reporter from Namibia talked about the male dominated media. "Programming is mostly from male standpoints," Williams said, "if a man says it's news, it is news."



Sandra Williams


The main focus of the conference is to make USF journalism students aware of the complexity of the African continent. It is a difficult place for reporting, between structure of government and widespread corruption. In Africa, the battle for a free press is constantly being waged and the desire to discover the truth and inform the people are as intense as anywhere in the world.

Saturday, October 03, 2009



I am attending the Conference of African Journalists at the University of South Florida, held at the Vinoy in beautiful St. Petersburg.

Had to cross the 5K Race for The Cure to get to the hotel. I was on the wrong side of the river of pink clad runners for the Susan B Komen foundation. It was a while since I ran a 5K, and I felt a little like an outsider looking in. I crossed 1st Street wistfully, longing to be a part of the action. Maybe next year...

Deb Wolfe, one of my favorite professors, is talking about podcasting. She is entertaining the group, she does have a folksy way about her belies her talents. She gave me a boost in morale when I really needed it. That is always a subject I am interested in. I am here to get some podcasting skills...


My understanding of the African Continent is woeful. It is immensely interesting not only as a place but a concept. The convergence of people and politics, governments and tribal, make the continent a place that seems foreign but intensely human.

Dr. Silvia is talking about the audience expectations, and the attentiveness of the readership. Day one is solid, but after that it is a bit dicey for the saleability of the story.

Power is something to be shared between the journalist and the audience. Those who stay in power and use their power in the best possible way are those who share some of the power.

Story telling becomes important as a power to enact change, and the technology is there to make storytelling a function of that change.



This is my computer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.

Deb is a techie, and she knows her stuff. I wish this baby, and my weak Panasonic camera is no match for her gear. But I am just a fly on the wall today.

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Hello from my cell phone....

Friday, August 07, 2009

Smiley Face Atheists: Survey Finds Non-Believers to Be Upbeat

http://www.politicsdaily.com/bloggers/david-gibson



Posted:
08/7/09




Last time we looked in on America's unbelievers, they were registering a growing disappointment in President Obama's track record on their issues, with special concern that he was spending too much time on God talk and on placating the religiously inclined.

Now, however, comes word that could give the godless reason to smile -- if they aren't already: A new study of some 5,800 non-believers reports that contrary to popular conceptions of atheists as crabby misanthropes, they in fact tend to be as happy as their believing brethren, and are in fact more satisfied than people who are uncertain in their beliefs, or in their unbeliefs.

"This new survey reports that confident nonbelievers are more emotionally healthy with respect to 'fence sitters' or religious doubters, shows that 'spirituals' report less satisfaction with their lives than those who identify with other self-labels, and suggests that the common assumption that greater religiosity relates to greater happiness and life satisfaction is not quite true," says a release from the Center for Inquiry (CFI), a leading association of secularists, humanists, agnostics and atheists -- the range of "non-theists" who are often lumped in the polling category of "Nones," or those who reported no religious affiliation.

CFI conducted the Non-Religious Identification Survey (NRIS) with Luke Galen, an associate professor at Grand Valley State University in Grand Rapids, Mich., who has an article on the study, "Profiles of the Godless," in the current edition of CFI's magazine, Free Inquiry.

One might expect that non-believers would already be pretty happy, given the high profile of recent best-selling neo-atheist authors Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris, and the fact that recent national surveys have shown a steady growth in the "Nones" to more than 16 percent of the U.S. population -- a real eye-opener (and rallying cry) for those who preach about America as a "Christian nation." That 16.1 percent figure comes from the huge U.S. Religious Landscape Survey released by the Pew Forum in April.

Similarly, the latest American Religious Identification Survey (ARIS), released in March, showed those professing no religious affiliation was at 15 percent, and nearly double the 8.2 percent figure of the 1990 ARIS. The latest survey also showed that the Nones were the only category to gain in every state in the Union, while the percentage of Americans who are Christian continued to slip, to 76 percent from 86.2 percent in 1990.

The impetus for the new CFI survey was in part the frustration at perceived gaps in those and other studies, which Galen said tend to focus on believers and to give short-shrift to the nuances of non-belief within the Nones category, which is so small that it is difficult to profile accurately. There is also a problem in labels: Some identify as atheists, others as agnostics or humanists or secularists. And many of the unaffiliated, even those who would self-identify as non-believers, still like to describe themselves as "spiritual" -- a label that tends to rankle committed atheists. (And atheists themselves debate the difference between "positive" atheism -- affirming there is no God -- and "negative" atheism, which holds that there is no evidence for God.)

In addition, earlier studies tended to reinforce the notion that atheists could be as dogmatic as any Southern fundamentalist -- an impression that can certainly be bolstered by a visit to most any gathering of hard-core non-theists, or indeed by reading Hitchens and Dawkins et al. These earlier studies portrayed non-believers as largely well-educated and male (and white, though Galen does not break it down by race in this study), and with fewer social connections and a penchant for difficult relations with family members (as if that is a distinguishing characteristic) perhaps brought on by their countercultural choice.

Galen's survey claims to dispel those stereotypes, but in fact the numbers don't necessarily do that. The new NRIS study actually shows that non-believers, especially true atheists, tend to be men with advanced degrees and a much higher socioeconomic ranking than most Americans. He found that female non-believers are far more likely to identify as "spiritual" than "atheist," and they are more likely to have a wider social circle than committed atheists, who tended to rank much lower on the scale of "agreeableness." (However, "spirituals reported lower satisfaction with their lives than those with other belief labels," Galen writes. So there.)

Another problem is that Galen's survey drew exclusively from the membership of the Center for Inquiry and people they recommended; a "snowball sample" of self-selected non-believers who would likely be able to articulate their views and be more committed to them than the mass of unwashed unbelievers covered by the national Pew and ARIS surveys.

In short, whatever their gains and their relative levels of happiness, committed unbelievers appear to have a lot more proselytizing to do.

For one thing, those who call themselves atheist or agnostic still account for just 1.6 million Americans. Moreover, the Pew survey showed that while all the religious "switching" by Americans (more than half change religious labels during their lifetime) bolsters the unaffiliated category -- some one-quarter of those who switch drop off the religious radar altogether -- most of the unaffiliated are not convinced by arguments against religion. In addition, the unaffiliated -- the Nones -- actually have a worse retention rate than the old-time religions they dismiss.

Worse still, a leading religious demographer, Eric Kaufmann of the University of London, predicts that the growth rate among the Nones should top out at about 17 percent between the years 2030 to 2040. According to the Association of Religion Data Archives, the Nones may be their own worst enemy in this regard because they have low fertility rates and thus trend older -- which Galen's study also confirms.

So is atheism better than theism, or uncertainty? This seems to be an odd way to frame the argument, though it is in keeping with the trend in American religion and culture toward the therapeutic -- if it makes you feel good, it must be good. Odd that atheists are now approaching their preaching from the same angle. Indeed, looking at how well the prosperity preachers have done, they might do better to emphasize the relative wealth of their followers.

Either way, the latest research will at the very least give both believers and non-believers more fodder for their ongoing arguments. And that should make both camps happier than anything else.

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Brights 101: What is a new atheist?

July 30, 8:18 AM · Dorene Braun - Norfolk Brights Examiner
The Out Campaign
The OUT Campaign Logo

What is an atheist?

Atheists come in two basic types. The first simply lacks belief in God or gods. The second believes that there is no God or gods (positive atheism).

What is a new atheist?

A new atheist is a positive atheist. Further, a new atheist is unafraid to say that he or she is an atheist and insists that his or her point of view be heard and rights respected. New atheists are encouraged by recent surveys that show that nearly 25% of people in the United States don’t believe in God, although some may believe in a higher power of some sort (American Religious Identification Survey 2008). Atheists and other nonbelievers are now a large enough minority to demand a “place at the table” of civic discourse.

New atheists are intolerant of religion; many work to reduce the influence of religion on society and argue that religion should be abandoned as something that humankind no longer needs.

Who are the Four Horsemen?

These are authors of recent bestselling books critical of religion. They are outspoken new atheists and the de facto leaders of the new atheist movement. D.J. Grothe of the Center for Inquiry first called them the Four Horsemen of the Counter-Apocalypse. It is a reference to the Biblical Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: conquest, war, famine and death.

  • Sam Harris wrote The End of Faith, in which he argued that religious belief was becoming increasingly dangerous in the modern world. In response to the thousands of letters he received in response to this book, he wrote a second, Letter to a Christian Nation.
  • Daniel Dennett, co-director of the Center for Cognitive Studies and a professor at Tufts University, wrote Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon and Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and The Meaning of Life. Dennett calls himself a bright.
  • Richard Dawkins, a British ethologist and evolutionary biologist, wrote The God Delusion and The Selfish Gene, in which he reformulates natural selection in light of social biology, among many other books. Dawkins is the originator of the OUT campaign.
  • Christopher Hitchens, who has written for many well-known U.S. magazines, wrote God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything in which he criticizes not only Christianity but all religions, including neo-paganism. He is described as an antitheist.

What is the OUT Campaign?

It’s a public awareness campaign encouraging atheists and other nonbelievers who may be keeping silent about their worldview to speak out in order to show that they are a larger minority than many believe and that they are no different than their neighbors, friends and coworkers.

For more info:

Sam Harris

Daniel Dennett

Richard Dawkins

Christopher Hitchens

The OUT Campaign

Copyright 2009 Examiner.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Author
Dorene Braun is an Examiner from Norfolk. You can see Dorene's articles at: "http://www.Examiner.com/x-14776-Norfolk-Brights-Examiner"

Jimmy Carter: 'Stop abusing women in the name of God'

July 24, 1:48 PM · D.M. Murdock - Freethought Examiner
Jimmy Carter enjoying a day out
Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter

Last week, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter released a widely disseminated statement concerning the global mistreatment of women based on religious texts and doctrines. Mr. Carter was so disturbed by the sexism within his own church that he left it after 60 years. In his commentary, Carter quoted the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" and the Bible (Gal 3:28) to demonstrate his own integrity as concerns race, religion and gender. He then remarked:

This view that women are somehow inferior to men is not restricted to one religion or belief. It is widespread. Women are prevented from playing a full and equal role in many faiths... The male interpretation of religious texts and the way they interact with, and reinforce, traditional practices justify some of the most pervasive, persistent, flagrant and damaging examples of human rights abuses."

Carter is to be commended for having the daring—a sad statement in itself that it is "daring" to speak out on behalf of women—to take on the religious tyranny that has ruled this planet for too long. As he says, he is in a later stage of his life and as part of a mysterious group of "Elders" he has been selected to publicize this very enlightened view concerning women and religion. Further displaying this vital courage, Carter declares:

The justification of discrimination against women and girls on grounds of religion or tradition, as if it were prescribed by a Higher Authority, is unacceptable."

We wholeheartedly agree, and we thank Mr. Carter and the Elders for taking this sorely overdue step—let us hope that others will follow suit and that those individuals still engaging in misogyny and sexism, religiously based or otherwise, will feel ashamed of themselves.

"Holy Scriptures" themselves are sexist

Moses Exhorting His Followers (Numbers 21)
Moses Exhorting His Followers (Numbers 21)

Unfortunately, Carter's closing contention concerning the traditional establishers of the three Abrahamic religions, Christ, Paul, Moses and Muhammad, all calling for "proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God" stumbles, for, while it is diplomatic, it is certainly not true. According to the Bible, Moses was responsible for an atrocious amount of genocide, such as at Numbers 31:15-18, where, after his Israelites slaughter thousands of Midianites, Moses asks, "Have you let all the women live?" The great Jewish prophet next gives an ethnocentric reason to murder them all and then remarks:

Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man by lying with him. But all the young girls who have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves."

What this last line means, naturally, is that the Israelite warriors get to kidnap the young virgin girls and use them as sex slaves.

In the meantime, the "Prince of Peace" Jesus Christ stated he was not here to bring peace but a sword (Mt 10:34), and made other remarks that create enmity:

For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be earthquakes in divers places, and there shall be famines and troubles: these [are] the beginnings of sorrows." (Mk 13:18)
If any one comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple." (Lk 14:26)

Paul, of course, repeatedly made derogatory remarks about women, such as:

But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is God. (1 Cor 11:3)

Sounding very proto-Islamic Paul follows this sexist commentary with a diatribe against women's hair and an exhortation for women praying or prophesying to cover their heads. (1 Cor 11:5ff) After these comments, Paul says that men were not created for women, but women were made for men. (1 Cor 11:8).

There's more woman-dominating speech at Ephesians 5:22-24:

Wives, be subject to your husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. As the church is subject to Christ, so let wives also be subject in everything to their husbands."

At 1 Timothy 2:11-15, Paul goes on a rant that women should be quiet and submissive, because Eve ate the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the Garden of Eden, dictating that all women—who are by their mere gender guilty by association—can redeem themselves by bearing children and being modest:

Let a woman learn in silence with all submissiveness. I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent. For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor. Yet woman will be saved through bearing children, if she continues in faith and love and holiness, with modesty."

And there's more in the "Good Book" that contradicts Carter's euphoric and hopeful interpretation, such as Paul repeatedly exhorting slaves to obey their masters, as at Titus 2:9:

Bid slaves to be submissive to their masters and give satisfaction in every respect."

The pro-slavery and pro-government biblical rhetoric can also be found 1 Peter 2:13-18:

Be subject for the Lord's sake to every human institution, whether it be to the emperor as supreme, or to governors as sent by him to punish those who do wrong and to praise those who do right. For it is God's will that by doing right you should put to silence the ignorance of foolish men. Live as free men, yet without using your freedom as a pretext of evil; but live as servants of God. Honor all men. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honor the emperor.

"Servants, be submissive to your masters with all respect, not only to the kind and gentle but also to the overbearing."

How can we "honor all men" and then allow some to be slaves to overbearing masters? There would seem to be (at least) two voices here, including a propagandist for the emperor.

Nor does the Koran, attributed to Muhammad, speak out against slavery—indeed, fervent followers of Islam often label themselves "slaves of Allah." While Surah 2:256 says there is "no compulsion in religion," this passage is abrogated by later ones stating:

The only true faith in God's site is Islam" (Q 3:19)
He that chooses a religion over Islam, it will not be accepted from him and in the world to come he will be one of the lost." (Q 3:86)
It is not for true believers men or women to take their choice in the affairs if God and His apostle decree otherwise. He that disobeys God and His apostle strays far indeed." (Q 33:36)

Unbelievers in Allah, the Koran and Muhammad are threatened with the hideous punishment of eternal hellfire, as at Surah 2:92-6:

God's curse be upon the infidels! Evil is that for which they have bartered away their souls. To deny God's own revelation [the Koran], grudging that He should reveal His bounty to whom He chooses from among His servants! They have incurred God's most inexorable wrath. An ignominious punishment awaits the unbelievers."
Demon in Islamic Hell torturing women (edited)
Demon in Islamic Hell torturing women (edited)

There exist centuries-old Islamic images of Muhammad in Hell watching a demon torture women for uncovering their hair. There is nothing "equitable" about the treatment of women as ordained in the Koran:

Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient.

Concerning a man's right to marry a woman, the Koran (4:24) remarks:

Also, [forbidden to you are] married women, except those whom you own as slaves."

If these slave women are married, there must have been husbands somewhere, and one may presume that they are no longer alive, having been murdered by those who have enslaved their wives. Equitable?

As we can see, there is a serious problem with Mr. Carter's heartfelt commentary, but we can overlook his current sunny perspective, so long as it increasingly becomes understood that the religions and their scriptures themselves are hardly devoid of sexist speech that is merely being "misinterpreted" by men in order to hold sway over women.

Indeed, contrary to Carter's conclusions, the rampant misogyny and sexism found within religion are readily traceable to the attitudes of the alleged founders of organized faiths. We need to get at the heart of the issue, which is that humans possess a strange megalomaniacal quirk causing them to think that the God of the cosmos is writing books especially for them—books full of atrocity, hatred, oppression, enslavement, terror, warfare and genocide. That's the real problem, because books serve as brainwashing propaganda—it does no good at all to talk about "erroneous interpretation" when in fact there is no other way to interpret calls to hegemony, oppression, domination, bigotry, cruelty, discrimination and violence.

What the world really needs are new and improved writings revered for their enlightened content, not for their purported supernatural origins. Championing Dark Age and Stone Age texts will never lead to an evolved and peaceful world, no matter how hard we try to find seeds of goodness in them. Instead of desperately searching for seeds in bloated bags of intellectual refuse, let us obtain fresh sacks of seeds! And then let us plant these seeds of true human enlightenment with all due haste for our future generations.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Thursday, June 18, 2009

my new project... askmewhyidrink.com a place to discuss and answer the question "why do YOU drink (or not)?" I want to know! It does NOT refer to sobriety, AA or any of that (no judgments) I just ant to know what makes a person drink (even if it is just for fun.)

Thursday, May 21, 2009

The setting of Eugene O’Neill’s The Iceman Cometh is simple, but utilizes powerful imagery, setting the tone for a classic drama of despair and the “pipe dreams” of redemption.

The ironically named “Harry Hope’s” is a drinking establishment on the West Side of New York, which in the summer of 1912 becomes the last refuge of his “friends” and patrons, many of whom are residents of the rooming house directly above the bar. “Harry Hope’s is a Raines-Law hotel of the period,” referring to the attempt by the New York State legislature in 1896 to regulate drinking by passing laws which regulated the sale of alcohol in “hotels” that served food. (Wikipedia) “The food provision,” says O’Neill in the preface, “ was generally circumvented by putting a property sandwich in the middle of each table, an old desiccated ruin of dust-laden bread and mummified ham or cheese which only the drunkest yokel from the sticks ever regarded as anything but noisome table decoration.” (O'Neill) It was a loose pretense to keep Hope’s customers supplied with a steady stream of bad whiskey.

Disgraced Harvard Law student Willie Oban’s “loophole of whiskey” drowns the last vestiges of hope for Harry’s patrons, all sitting in various states of drunkenness in the backroom of the bar. They congregate behind a dirty black curtain in an area divorced from the main barroom.

Larry Slade, a former Anarchist (in “the Movement”) and one of Harry’s drunkards, sees the bar as “the No Chance Saloon. It’s Bedrock Bar, The End of the Line CafĂ©, The Bottom of the Sea Rathskeller… Don’t you notice the beautiful calm in the atmosphere? That’s because it’s the last harbor.” (O'Neill)

Lost in the shadows, dark and grim, drinking establishments have long been associated with a sense of despair, a feeling of hopelessness. The setting is 1912, on the cusp of World War I, bringing an ominous tone to the drama of The Iceman Cometh. The dark spirit reflects in the sad musings of the characters, all of whom are battling past demons (and for former adversaries Lewis and Wetjoen, the Boer War itself) as well as resignation from the social turmoil that eventually would envelope the world. The Anarchist movement of the era is prominent, and helps maintain an air of contention that fuels the character’s desire to retreat to Harry’s, relegated to watching life “from the grandstands.”

It is also a place ripe for salvation, or at least the promise of salvation. History reminds us that grief and anguish are the soil where the seeds of redemption take root. The sparse setting in O’Neill’s drama illuminates the meager confidence in the character’s souls, where they sit motionless and pine for lost “pipe dreams,” waiting expectantly for the arrival of Theodore Hickman (Hickey), a salesman whose yearly appearance for Harry’s birthday brings the promise of good times and free booze.

But not this year.

Hickey arrives not with the expected party, but with a new sobriety and a clarity that he quickly tries to inject into the small remnants of hope at Harry’s bar. Hickey has found his salvation, as with all who claim to be a messiah, declares to have found the way, and is convinced his is the true path. He attempts to hold a mirror to the reluctant souls at the bar, urging them to “salvation” by forcing them to reach out from their misery and attempt their dreams. His logic is in the effort to reach their “pipe dreams,” even if they fail, will release them from the confines of their sad fantasies and bring them peace.

It is at that this point where the drama moves from the depth of Harry’s backroom to the main bar, where grimy windows hint at the outside world and an escape from the prison of whiskey soaked dejection. One by one, characters move out to fulfill their redemption, with the intent to leave Harry Hopes’, never to return.

What Hickey failed to grasp was in a life of drunkenness there is little to cling to but one’s own dreams. Moving from the dark cavern of the soul, seen in the dimly lit backroom of Harry’s bar, to the warm light of the real world quickly becomes harsh and unrealistic.

All those moved to action by Hickey’s sales-pitch energy sadly come back to the darkness of the backroom, disheartened and now without even pipe dreams that kept them alive. The bar is a sanctuary but without the relief of hope. Even Harry cannot find the old respite in drink - the booze having no effect. “What did you do to this booze? That’s what we’d like to hear. Bejees you done something. There’s no life or kick in it now.” (O'Neill)

Redemption does come, however, when Hickey confesses to the murder of his loving wife, revealing that madness is the source of his “deliverance.” The dark of the back bar with its heavy curtain become like a church confessional. However, it is not Hickey who is saved; it is his confessors – the startled barflies of Harry’s – who see they were following in the ramblings of a madman and return with relief to the comfort of their old illusions.

The drama ends as it began, in the gloom of a rundown bar, wearily celebrating Harry Hope’s birthday with a melancholy song. Each celebrant, back in their own low dreams, sings a verse of their own, oblivious to the others. For the audience, the bittersweet ending of O’Neill’s The Iceman Cometh, written in 1940, punctuates a dark foreshadowing of the social unrest prior to World War I, with the horrors and grief of things to come.

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Monday, April 13, 2009

Got nailed for Easter.... Welcome to the home stretch of my second semester.... Imagine some stranger falling back in time from Easter last year to inform me what Easter 2009 would bring, I would laughlingly have him locked up. Margaret, USFSP and the sheer amount of beer I have consumed would be a hard sell to anyone, much less a dumbass as myself. Imagine, if you will, some 40 (or so) year-old slacker such as myself informed they would fall madly in love, find some sort of satisfaction in Academia, and have my two grown daughters finally on their own (somewhat). Well, you can imagine my surprise. But, alas, it is all true.... I cannot believe my good fortune. I am in love, and am moving along here at USF swimmingly (for the most part), and am primed for the best summer I have ever experienced. Margaret says there is an opportunity to go to China this year. Friggin' China! That has been a dream for most my life! We can get a furnished place for dirt cheap, and a round trip ticket for 500 bucks! Holy Shit!
Check out some cool stuff by one of my Journalism Classmates

Monday, March 02, 2009

On January 14th, a group of about 25 local residents rallied at the Republic Bank building on the corner of 4th and Central in Saint Petersburg to present a petition to Representative C.W. Bill Young titled "Support President-elect Obama's Economic Recovery Plan." Rep. Young, whose office was on the 14th floor, is the Republican Congressman from Florida's 10th district, which includes Saint Petersburg.

The event was sponsored by the political action group MoveOn.org, and with 392 signatures, the petition included many personal testaments of economic hardship. It was a movement to show broad support for president-elect Obama's economic plans which include investments for green jobs, health care and clean energy. According to the MoveOn.org Political Action press release, the rally will "urge their Representative, Bill Young, to pass Obama's plan quickly without weakening its policies."

"We expect Bill Young to look out for his constituents," said Joe Illingworth, local MoveOn.org member and host of the St. Pete event, one of over 200 such events held across the country. "We hope that Rep. Young won't let partisan politics stop this package from moving quickly through Congress so that ordinary Americans can get what they need to survive the crisis."

Held on a cool Wednesday morning, the event included local issues such as Progress Energy's recently enacted rate hike of 25%, announced in July 2008 and taking effect in this month's power bills. Many of the protesters carried extension cords to represent a desire to "unplug" the rate hike. Universal health care and the Iraq war were also discussed, with participants waving American flags, anti war banners and Obama-Biden signs at traffic on Central. Many cars honked in support.

Lorraine McCann, a MoveOn.org member, has been active with the group for the past 2 years. "I protested Vietnam," McCann said, "I started with MoveOn because of the war in Iraq." A woman protesting named Karen discussed the need for alternative energy sources. "We are in 'sunny' Florida... why isn't every new home built with a solar panel on the roof?"

The main topic of discussion was the struggling economy. Several speakers outlined the effects of the current financial crisis, where Florida has been hit with the largest over-the-month decrease in employment in the United States. There were 58,600 lost jobs in November 2008 according to figures from the US Department of Labor Statistics.

Jessica Tennyson, a homeless woman, talked about life in the streets, and her attempts to find a job. "In Saint Pete, life sucks," said Tennyson, who was celebrating her 23rd birthday at the rally. "In the last six months, the homeless population increased by 25 percent. I have applied to 125 jobs, but nothing." To help her celebrate, the group sang "Happy Birthday," and gave donations.

At 12:30 the first group of 10 participants, lead by Illingworth, moved to Rep. Young's office on the 14th floor to officially present the petition. The group was met by Yvonne Grey, a secretary for Young, who accepted the petition on his behalf. Ilingworth also requested a meeting with Young, and was told bu Grey the request would be processed.

In the lobby afterward, Illingworth felt the short ceremony went well."It was a typical response" and "we will pursue a personal meeting." A second group of protesters attempted to go to the 14th floor, but were turned away by security. Karen, one of the group not allowed to Rep Young's office, loudly voiced her disappointment. "They won't let us up... It was not very nice."

For further information about the petition and the other related events around the country go to www.MoveOn.org/2009/agenda/results.
Spotlights lights glow brightly, casting everything in a sharp yellow hue. The ceiling was low and the resulting heat stifled the dry stiff air. Air conditioning was limited, offering little comfort from the heat of the Florida afternoon.


People are milling around, walking slowly along crowded aisles with a non responsive haze in their eyes. Careful movements punctuated by frozen stares directed at displays strategically located along four paths which crossed the long building. Some people were in small groups also moving at a deliberately leisurely pace.


Occasionally a individual looks up and scans a vignette, studying an item on a crowded table, such as a ceramic pots, a plate or vase - many glazed in colorful hues perfectly placed on tables crowded throughout the building. Intermixed with the ceramics were artificial floral arrangements, sparkling glassware, picture frames and items puzzling in their shape and texture. They were all placed in immaculate positions and groupings on every flat surface available.


The walls, painted a soft cream color, were also decorated with a variety of colorful pictures, all perfectly leveled. Many of the pictures were hand painted, mostly incorporating floral themes. They were framed in ornately carved frames of dark woods painted dark cherry with touches of gold. In addition there were several mirrors and metal sculptures of a tropical theme. They were festively shaped and painted to look like birds and ships, using vibrant greens and deep blues, like you would expect in a tropical paradise.


A few people were rushing about, shuttling between the groups, many who have stopped at an interesting point in the aisle. The hurried people had intent looks on their faces, and a few were smiling. Most of them gazed intently at a fixed point in space as they quickly passed.


Pieces of various sizes, some small enough to fit in the palm of your hand to large enough to sit on the floor, many in bright colors such as fire engine red and deep ocean blue, stood out from a sea of dark earth tones, mostly tans and browns. Colors that evoked the sense of a desert mountain bathed in the glow as the sun slowly sets. There were many pieces in a dark brown, appearing nearly black like a cup of strong coffee. They usually were set with a brightly accented item, which would stand out in vibrant contrast.


Amongst the carefully decorated smaller items were several large pieces, the focus of the vignettes, tastefully placed at inviting angles. The pieces were designed to grab attention from approaching passersbys. A variety of colors and textures were represented, some with the smooth of leather, firm to the touch and the reminding the curious of the hide from which it was made. Other items constructed of fabric, soft and fuzzy, as you would expect of a small animal.


Designed for comfort, and accented with contrasting pillows, the pieces, some as large as eight feet in length offered the curious a place to sit and periodically nod slowly. A smartly dressed person would rush to assist the seated engaging them with curious expressions.


Occasionally a burst of air from a strategically placed ceiling fans tore through the stillness, offering brief relief from the choking warmth.

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

This is starting to look like a mandate....


Let's hope that this is a change for the better... But all life is change, and America is not exempt. The dejection on Fox news is palatable.


If you are in the Obama is Socialist camp, then Socialism must have been in the cards.


Get used to it.


To those who felt it was no real change to elect Obama, I guess an African-American in office is not change enough (it is change enough for me).


To those who voted for Prop. 2... BOO!


I guess equality is only on your terms, and this election of a black man is some sort of aberration. It was not long ago that blacks were NOT equal to the rest of "us."


I would pray for you, if it wasn't a fruitless exercise for an athiest like me. We are all equal, and must strive for peace.


This election can be good, you know. It might be a good thing for the world for a progressive America, since that is the definition of the term "progressive." Did you think of that, that you might be wrong thinking Obama is wrong for America? You could be wrong ("God" forbid)!


I have seen enough politics where I am convinced, at least for now, electing a black man is the coolest thing America has ever done!


Now that there is no hanging chads to argue about, and it is pretty clear how America thinks, lets really work to understand the universiality of mankind. Peace to all.


One last thought... America is more than economics! It is leadership, where cooler heads might have a chance to prevail.


To those who won tonight.....

I'm still in office for two months! Bwahahahaaa!


peace out, boy scouts...



Some More Random Thoughts...


I want to remind people how cool how an Obama win is.


Today, every first grader from every inner-city school is saying: hey, I can be president of the United States. Is that not America, or what?


And the world is saying; "there is hope for America". Remember, we just elected someone to run the country, by the highest vote count ever, who could not even piss in the same bathroom as the whites a generation ago. That was not bullshit, it was the LAW. Is it not a good thing to give a whole generation of Americans the goal of POTUS? Instead of success equating rap stars and sports fame?


My senior year of high school (1979), also the highest recorded marijuana use by seniors, had a SWAT team on the roof of the school. As a result race riots. Blacks agains Italians, and it was about something pretty stupid, in retrospect. (hint: it was about pot!) Doesn't it seem petty now, when equality for all is an achievable goal?


Do you hear the rumbling? It is the collective generations of people spinning in their graves. I am so proud. It is a genuine rebellion.


Never mind the economic policies of Obama, the rebellion envisioned by the 60', 70's and 80's have begun to rear its head!


It is not an economic thing, for those who want to narrow it in purely economic terms. That idea is self centered!


We are seeing social change at is most base.


A person of color to reach the top of the American political structure is something pretty damn special. If you want to call it Socialism, so be it. If you think that Obama will not bring any change, and that the whole system needs a reset, get real! A black man is in charge, is that not change?


A real change has come, and if that is not enough for you, so what? Let's get a dose of reality, the American people will only accept a change on their own terms, and this is it!


So you label President Obama a "Socialist." Do you think any person of the age of the Civil Rights movement would be called anything else? Any notion of equality and fairness, especially in the framework of race, can be decried as socialist.


It is a charge bordering on racism.


The redistribution of wealth is an attractive notion to a class of people who have been denied real wealth their entire lives. As Chris Rock once said; a basketball player is rich, the owner of the team is wealthy! The equality of race, when you reflect, screams of socialism.


Who cares?


This is the change America needs, and Obama is intelligent enough to rise to the challenge.


The saving grace is that a mandate has been an achieved. A decisive victory which will quash any discussion of voter fraud and hanging chads. Thankfully ACORN is history.


If it was even close, we would be arguing this election for months. The election will put to rest any doubt, and any opportunity for the Supreme Court to decide this election.


One last thought... leave it to a black man to clean up the mess of the rich white guy! Good luck President Obama.


Gooooo USA!